Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 8,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
(Arlington says this is the same question the Court always asks at “Step Zero” of its Chevron inquiry, pursuant to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am
While in Germany, Gabriela "said to the Competent Agency for Youth Services that she 'was not willing to return w[i]th the child to the United States.' " In an effort to bring about the return of his son to the United States, Keith filed Hague Convention proceedings in Germany through the United States Department of State. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
After settling on a design for a fryer, Global-Tech obtained a patent opinion from its United States attorney indicating that the proposed fryer would not infringe any United States patents. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:15 am
The conditions are as follows: Petitioner must be ‘‘in custody’’ when the petition is filed – “In custody” can include prison, parole, bond or other restraint resulting from the state court convictionViolation of constitutional law – The writ of habeas corpus must argue that the petitioner is “in custody” as a result of a violation of federal law or the Constitution of the United States.Exhaustion… [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:32 pm
” Further, the EPA stated that the petitioner has not identified any language in any particular water quality standard that the petitioner believes to be vague or insufficiently clear. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:17 am
” In any case, the petitioner points to the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 5:13 pm
In her order, Judge Lee writes the following: The Petitioner filed her initial Petition for Dissolution of Marriage on January 15, 2014. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
The petitioners claimed that the national firm was nothing but a referral network and should not be deemed a legitimate law firm in that state. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Section 2254(d)(2) of Title 28, United States Code provides federal habeas relief may not be granted on any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in the state courts unless the state court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
If it does not “ ‘give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice’ ” of its scope, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm
Subsidies The United States is accustomed to accusing other governments of subsidizing industries exporting to the United States in violation of world trade rules. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
. ____ (2013) and the ways in which, for me, sheds light on a reality of the structure of international human rights and business that may be belied by the torrent of lofty language churning out of elite state and non-state actors. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
United States 19-1052Issue: Whether a guilty plea waives a challenge on appeal to the denial of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to represent himself. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:05 am
In outlining the documentation necessary for a TN visa application, the regulations state that “[t]he applicant must present documentation” to establish that he/she “is seeking entry to the United States to engage in business activities for a United States employer(s) or entity(ies). [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:24 am
United States highlights the longstanding difficulty in defining regulatory taking as well as determining when a regulatory takings claim becomes ripe for judicial review. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
By: Michael Thompson The United States Supreme Court has ruled that pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are “outside salesmen” who are not entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
