Search for: "True v True" Results 4921 - 4940 of 33,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
By Eric Goldman Windsor Auctions, Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 2008 WL 2622791 (N.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:52 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Pennant Service Company, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Additionally, the factual portion and any accompanying depositions must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, as well as nonhearsay factual allegations of an evidentiary character which, if true, establish every element of the offense charged and defendant's commission thereof (CPL 100.15[3] & 100.40[1]; see People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986]; see also People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 [1987]). [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
"  Specifically, a motion filed at the beginning of the trial (seeking additional voir dire), had this to say about the action:    While it is true that the United States Attorney's Office and the SEC are two separate agencies, it is also true that much of this investigation has been conducted by them jointly. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:47 pm
  Yeah, he only testified because he got caught, but that doesn't make his testimony any less true. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:30 pm
  Well, if that was ever true, it's not the case now. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:42 am by Eric Citron
  After Justice Ginsburg asked about standing, Justice Breyer opened the merits questioning whether that’s even true based on the way the statute defines exchanges (namely, as state-created entities) and then directs the federal government to establish “such an exchange” when the state fails to do so. [read post]