Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 13,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2017, 7:49 am
For example, the government maintains that grandparents of persons in the United States, or grandchildren of persons in the United States, categorically do not have “bona fide relationships with persons in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing [sic] in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
United States Donald Trump’s legal team wants a defamation claim that was filed against the President by a former contestant on reality show the Apprentice to be dismissed on the grounds that it is politically motivated. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
If it says “freedom of speech,” that phrase has to be interpreted to make sense to the current citizens of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am
The announcement also mentioned a companion complaint filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego (this post continues below the document): 17-07-06 Qualcomm v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
A federal district court in California refused to exercise jurisdiction in a wage and hour action brought for violations of the California Labor Code and other state laws and seeking PAGA penalties, finding that the evidence proffered by the defendant fell short of the preponderance of the evidence standard espoused in the United States Supreme Court’s Standard Fire decision to establish the amount in controversy in CAFA cases. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:09 am
District Court, Central District of California, United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:01 am
California v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
To begin with, the A.G. had two databases about mass shootings in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:44 am
United States of America et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:44 am
United States of America et al. v. [read post]
