Search for: "Way v. State"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 59,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2013, 8:40 pm
In case you missed it, John Stinneford and I have been having a lively debate in the comments section of my most recent post on my (admittedly novel) claim that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause can be read in a state-specific way. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:23 pm
Mollett v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 may ultimately be best remembered for the language used by Lord Justice Ward in his judgment, rather than for any particular point of law. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:09 am
In the recent case of Downs v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2008] EWHC 2666 Mr Justice Collins was asked to consider whether the defendant was complying with EC Directive (91/414/EEC) (the Directive) which was implemented in the UK by the Plant Protection Products Regulations 2005. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:41 pm
" The Court distinguished this case from Webster v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm
However, the plaintiff stated that “we have no way of knowing if this is the case” but that it would be best to keep the mailbox closed and locked in the future. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:13 am
The appeals court stated it had no choice but to affirm. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
For over 50 years, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bivens v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 9:42 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am
[The Sosa v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
I am currently reading a fascinating new book by Richard Ellis ,Aggressive Nationalism: McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
By way of example, a parent can reasonably expect to spend time with their children at home without unwanted surveillance. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 12:49 pm
Gauci v Malta [2009] ECHR 1280 [Link is to rtf] Hat-tip to the Garden Court Bulletin for this one. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:10 pm
The Grand Chamber’s judgment defines in an interesting way the role and responsibilities of lawyers in relation to society and in relation to their clients and to the administration of justice. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:05 pm
See this post on Dillon v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Florida v. [read post]
