Search for: "Welling v. Welling" Results 4921 - 4940 of 110,257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am by Sotiris Paphitis
Such a provision would go against the high standards adopted by the ECtHR and the Council of Europe’s recommendations, which severely restrict the cases under which journalists can be compelled to reveal their sources (see for example the judgments in Voskuil v. the Netherlands and Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands). [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The court instead says there’s nothing untoward about Congress deprivileging “speech integral to criminal conduct”: So all FOSTA does is clarify and reinforce the prior exclusion of immunity within the specific context of sex trafficking, and explain that the limit on immunity extends to civil liability as well. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 8:42 am by Alyssa Arone
[i] R v Bertuzzi, 2004 BCPC 472 at paras 21-9.The post Hockey Injury Lawsuit Sparks Discussion About Player Safety first appeared on Derfel. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:18 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Image from PixabaySummer is well underway - although this Kat has been enjoying a mild and sunny winter in the southern hemisphere, whilst keeping an eye on IP news and events. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
“It is well established that an attorney’s affidavit may not be used to supplement the record on appeal” Silny v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Only nine months after the Supreme Court eliminated the federal constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Totally typical and routine.But today, on remand, the Ninth Circuit says: "Well, when we decided the case before, we did so relying on a prior Ninth Circuit precedent. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]; Aybar v US Tires & Wheels of Queens, LLC, 211 Ad 3d 40, 48-49 [2d Dept 2022].) [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]