Search for: "Wells v. Park"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 5,447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
This is the crux of City of Long Beach v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
Ray's case was affirmed in 2003 in Ray v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See Volusia County v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:16 pm
Which sort of ruins the experience -- as well as degrades the trails -- for everyone. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
They also publish books and comic books, produce movies and television shows, and create amusement parks, all of which use the properties as a base for the product. [ 21 ] As a result, Disney is a significant consumer of intellectual properties as well a producer thereof. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:01 am
Police officer's turning on flashing lights to pull up behind an already parked car is not a stop. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Hyde Park, MA; Remy Jules, President) Bens-Best-Deals S Corp. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
In Elie v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:39 am
"I think it's something to worry about not only in the parks, but where you live, as well," said parent Angela Summers. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:32 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in Parr v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 10:43 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:45 pm
Burhoe v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Does it matter that Huntington Park has, to use the words of Justice Klein, a "high transient population" -- moreover, that H.P. has the highest rate of vehicle theft in the nation? [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
This experience suggests that many existing tax havens as well as countries like Austria and Lichtenstein, will decide as Singapore has that being known as a place to park “dirty money” is a net negative. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
The dissenters, including Presiding Justice Scudder, wpuld have held that defendant's excessive nervousness rendered the police well within their rights to continue the investigation, which did not require reasonable suspicion, and that keeping the defendant did not constitute detention. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 11:23 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
Based on Griffiths v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:36 am
But that may be coming to an end with the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Sonoma County Park Associates v. [read post]
