Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 15,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2024, 2:43 am
” “It is well established that “[t]o state a cause of action for legal malpractice arising from negligent representation in a criminal proceeding, [a] plaintiff must allege [the additional element of] his innocence or a colorable claim of innocence of the underlying offense” (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169, 171 [1987]; see Britt v Legal Aid Soc., Inc., 95 NY2d 443, 445 [2000]; Shields v Carbone, 78 AD3d 1440, 1443 [3d Dept… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:08 am
Ag Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:44 am
Bear Stearns 7 Co. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:07 am
They maintained that Baker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 am
On this day in ... ... 1521, an international conference that bears among the best names in history, the Diet of Worms, was convened by Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor in Worms, a city in what is now southern Germany. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 6:25 am
Maine v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
The DWP has issued a circular in the wake of the Court of Appeal judgment in MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13 (Our report coming soon, honest). [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
The DWP has issued a circular in the wake of the Court of Appeal judgment in MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13 (Our report coming soon, honest). [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
Hill 20-1587Issues: (1) Whether a state may require convicted sex offenders to obtain and carry a state identification bearing the words “sex offender” without facially violating the First Amendment’s prohibition on compelled speech; and (2) whether a convicted sex offender has a First Amendment right not to be prosecuted for fraudulently altering a state identification card after scratching off a statutorily required sex offender designation. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
Hill 20-1587Issues: (1) Whether a state may require convicted sex offenders to obtain and carry a state identification bearing the words “sex offender” without facially violating the First Amendment’s prohibition on compelled speech; and (2) whether a convicted sex offender has a First Amendment right not to be prosecuted for fraudulently altering a state identification card after scratching off a statutorily required sex offender designation. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 6:47 am
In Touchcom, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:57 am
It is easy to identify some of the ways in which the Supreme Court lost its bearings. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:44 pm
Shaibu, 920 F.2d at 1426 (citing United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:58 am
” Chestone v. [read post]
