Search for: "Case v. People" Results 4941 - 4960 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
But pursuing litigation with little to no damages is sure to draw the ire of a busy district judge.The second case, Patch Rubber Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:01 pm by James Eckert
People v Backus, decided today, is one of those short Court of Appeals decisions which seem innocuous, but cryptic, until you read the decision below. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:04 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
This week a divided panel of the Fifth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
The panel opinion, which has now been vacated (as is always done when the court agrees to hear a case en banc) is here (Range v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court affirmed that point in the case of McIntyre v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:44 pm by Karl Olson
Supreme Court affirmed that point in the case of McIntyre v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
The above means that also the producer of a generic drug can indirectly infringe a Swiss type claim patent that reads on a second medical indication, which is the case if he offers or delivers the generic drug to people who have no license to apply the patented invention, while he knows, or it should be obvious to him given the circumstances of the case, that the drug is suitable for and will be used for the patented second medical indication. [read post]