Search for: "Doe Corporation" Results 4941 - 4960 of 51,608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Access DOE's Nuclear Energy website for additional information (click here). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Law School), a distinguished tax scholar, does a masterful job of bringing the critiques together and explaining their logic in a concise, lucid manner. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:24 pm by Ryan McCabe
The Act does not specify the amount of detail required for these documents. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 2:24 pm
To make this a trilogy, I'll post on close corporation governance again tomorrow and respond to the so-what objection - why does minority shareholder voice matter? [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:07 pm by Paul S.O. Barbeau
The act of incorporating as a not-for-profit corporation under the Not-For-Profit Corporations Act (Canada) or the Societies Act (British Columbia) does not mean that the corporation will automatically be tax-exempt or considered as a registered charity for the purposes of the Income Tax Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am by Larry Ribstein
   But it does seem clear that the courts are approaching the issue in a uniform fashion guided by the appellate decision’s contract-based analysis. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:15 pm by News Desk
Osamu Corporation said that at this time it does not believe that the recalled product or sushi made with the recalled product is available for purchase by consumers. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Francis Pileggi
Notably, the court explained, however, that an exculpatory charter provision does not apply to claims of breaches of the duty of loyalty, claims against officers or claims against controlling stockholders. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
  Under the Commissioner's rule, the corporation is not considered to be receiving any portion of the purchase price notwithstanding the selling shareholder's desire to benefit the corporation. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:15 am
   The California Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, unlike the General Corporation Law (Section 1905(b), does not expressly state that upon filing a certificate of cancellation, a limited partnership's powers, rights, and privileges "cease". [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A few days ago, as reported in this article, Michigan’s governor Gretchen Whitmer has proposed expanding the 6 percent corporate income tax to include S corporations and LLCs. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 11:21 am by Robert J. Tannous
Empirical research supports the argument that certain types of offensive shareholder activism have value, but it does not provide conclusive proof that they have value at any specific company at any specific time. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:16 am
An incorporated company does not ‘owe’ its existence to the Companies Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:57 am
 Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance by Lucian A. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:45 am by Jeff Sovern
Second, that these Republicans and Democrats have allied with big business to mutual advantage to create what she called “corporate crony capitalism. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:40 pm
  So what you do is create iTotallyFreakinHatePalaceOfPants.com, in which you expose their history of anti-consumer villainy, hint at suppositions of Third World sweatshop labor, and digitally paint a moustache on their corporate mascot, Peter Pantsman. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:17 am by Gene Takagi
The dissolution does not relieve the nonprofit corporation’s liability to creditors. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:39 am by Simon Holzer
However, the Federal Supreme Court did not follow this line of argument, since the patent prosecutor, registered as a representative in the patent register, was a stock corporation. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:32 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Big cases against corporate defendants or very complicated cases are more likely to be dealt with this way. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:01 am
  In what I view as a desperate effort to avoid liability, the general counsel argued that Delaware does not recognize expanding Caremark duties beyond the board of directors and to corporate officers. [read post]