Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 8,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Maryland does not apply to impeachment evidence when the Supreme Court has held that Brady does apply to impeachment evidence. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:28 am
If the offender does not use a weapon and the complainant is over 16 years old, there is no mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
The objection was based on Article 24(3) EPC whereas the Board referred to Article 24(1) EPC. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
The objection was based on Article 24(3) EPC whereas the Board referred to Article 24(1) EPC. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:41 am
After Mensingwe couldn’t see how the plaintiff could retain this $20 million+ verdict, but the First Circuit found a way – a bad way, but a way. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
Article 105 of the UN Charter provides: 1. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:54 am
As a result, in practice platforms get their immunity without extended court processes by invoking Section 230(c)(1)—which courts have interpreted broadly to immunize any action where a platform acts as a publisher, including content removal or filtering, and which does not require any showing of good faith for such removals. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:40 am
Denmark admits to allowing Danish producers to use Feta as a name for cheese exported to third countries, and defends this behavior by claiming that Article 13 does not apply to products exported to third countries. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:01 am
In the Grillo case, the defendants offered periodic payments (structured settlement) to settle a medical malpractice case. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:43 pm
Winck, B. a. (2021, November 1). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:28 pm
What does this mean for Pennsylvania? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
The two settlement agreements at issue in the case involve Schering's blood pressure drug K-Dur 20. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
§ 1052(c). [3] In re Elster, No. 20-2205, slip op. at 5 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Thompkins (08-1470) Argued: Mar. 1, 2010 Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit expanded the Miranda rule to prevent an officer from attempting to non-coercively persuade a defendant to cooperate where the officer informed the defendant of his rights, the defendant acknowledged that he understood them, and the defendant did not invoke them but did not waive them. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
Many of these laws take effect today, November 1. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
Many of these laws take effect today, November 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Access does, however, take issue with certain facts alleged by plaintiff, and asserts that:1. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
Cunningham in Advances in Juvenile Adjudicative Competence: A 10-year Update (38 Behavioral Sciences & the Law 406, 406–20 (2020)). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
" The SEC argued that the Second Circuit does have jurisdiction under Carson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:59 am
Judge Castle observed that the securities complaint does not allege that Lewis or any other defendant "stood to gain from non-disclosure" and to not allege "a quid pro quo type arrangement" or that failing to disclose the federal funding brought a benefit to any defendant. [read post]
