Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 4941 - 4960 of 12,588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Interestingly, the court stated that "consideration can be comprised of benefits beyond continued employment. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:36 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Cristina Lavecchia, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Citizens “A Raise” Joined by RAISE Act co-sponsors Senator Cotton and Senator Perdue for his Rose Garden announcement of support for enactment of the RAISE Act this morning, President Trump reaffirmed his campaign commitment to create “a merit-based immigration system that protects U.S. workers and taxpayers” that “demonstrates our compassion for struggling American families who deserve an immigration system that puts their needs first and that puts America… [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:21 am by Phyllis H. Marcus
The First Circuit rejected this argument, observing that the consumers (1) had not alleged that the items were poorly made, (2) had received the benefits of their bargains, and (3) that a false sense of a product’s value does not constitute injury. [read post]
The First Circuit rejected this argument, observing that the consumers (1) had not alleged that the items were poorly made, (2) had received the benefits of their bargains, and (3) that a false sense of a product’s value does not constitute injury. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:42 am by John Lewis
First, the Second Circuit found its earlier decision, Jock I, “did not squarely address whether the arbitrator had the power to bind absent class members given that they, unlike the parties here, never consented to the arbitrator determining whether class arbitration was permissible under the agreement in the first place. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:32 am by Adam B. Edgecombe, Esq.
The post CASE LAW UPDATE: WHAT A RECENT APPELLATE DECISION CAN TELL ASSOCIATIONS SEEKING THEIR ATTORNEY’S FEES FOR LITIGATION appeared first on . [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
First, it argues that the relevant provisions of 2703 use the term `warrant,’ which traditionally means an order regarding the search or seizure of physical property rather than an order compelling action by a person. [read post]