Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS" Results 4941 - 4960 of 7,540
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A request for re-establishment was refused.The applicant filed a complaint before epi on March 24, 2009. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm by hparsons
“We simply have to make sure that we’re providing the safest possible product to begin with. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:40 pm
Whether this decision will have any bearing on the newly introduced Smith bill has yet to be determined. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am by Don Cruse
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE AND JERRY PATTERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS TEXAS LAND COMMISSIONER, No. 12-0483 Granted for argument on June 7, 2013 This is another case about whether the Texas General Land Office has taken land along a beachfront without compensation by moving the line at which the public has an easement for access. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Florian Mueller
The ITC could have interpreted its statute (including the part concerning the public interest) differently; regulators could have taken decisive action against Samsung; and U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:24 pm by Ron Coleman
,” (3) in-house lawyers at drug and device companies, (4) government officials interested in our field (we received, for example, occasional hits from the FDA and Congressional offices), and (5) other publications, including folks who wrote both at blogs and in traditional media. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
But they remain oblivious to the undoubted power of non-state normative systems that operate within, beyond and often in opposition to state law—including normative systems they themselves construct as public officials, as architects of the structures of private governance, and as shapers of quotidian legal routines. [read post]
27 May 2013, 11:29 am
Publications Quebec has the annual statutes going back to 1996, current consolidations, and the tables of provisions brought into force, all of which are official versions. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:51 am by Josh Sturtevant
However, military officials would not tell NBC 5 Investigates if they plan to do that. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:51 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The one that we’re most familiar with is the right to choose not to testify against yourself (self-incrimination). [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
 In re Territo (a Ninth Circuit decision) applied that rule in affirming that it was perfectly lawful to hold Territo as a POW, and Ex parte Quirin (a Supreme Court decision) not only said the same but also approved prosecution by military commission for both the citizens and non-citizens among the captured German saboteurs. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:48 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Second, it examines cases in which officials have made decisions that burden Indian religious exercise on public lands, prompting challenges under RFRA. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: You’re seventy-six years old and still quite active in litigating First Amendment cases. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:25 am by Kelly Buchanan
  “Undesirable in the public interest” is then defined later in the section: (8) For the purposes of this section, it is undesirable in the public interest for a person to bear a name or combination of names if, and only if, (a) it might cause offence to a reasonable person; or (b) it is unreasonably long; or (c) without adequate justification, it is, includes, or resembles, an official title or rank. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
”  Inexplicably, the Court distinguished the decision in Baraby, although it appears to have rejected its holding entirely. [read post]