Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 6,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am
Davis, which will also be argued next week, “the case of Texas death row inmate Duane E. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Par ailleurs, dans R. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog has been publishing in recent weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of the law. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
Davis of Davis & Campbell in Peoria, Ill. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
The second case, Davis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Bryant, although the internet citation of Ashmore v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 6:28 am
Despite laws and court precedents, the effect of the proposed rule isn’t clear, according to Jo Ellen Whitney, an attorney with the Davis Brown Law Firm in Des Moines, Iowa, and an editor of Iowa Employment Law Letter. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:25 am
Gist-Davis Slip op. at 9. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:53 pm
The recent Fifth Circuit opinion in Flagg v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Georgia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm
Kennedy’s concurrence in Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
App. 2010) (concurring opinion); Davis v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:04 am
Davis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-5239, Davis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman weighs in The Washington Post Fact Checker’s assertion that a statement about sex-offender recidivism by Justice Samuel Alito in Packingham v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
Constructive abandonment is routinely defined as the refusal of one spouse to engage in sexual relations with the other spouse for one or more years, when such refusal is unjustified, willful, and continual, and despite repeated requests for the resumption of sexual relations (see Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 13 [2d Dept 2009]; Gianis v Gianis, 67 AD3d 963 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
