Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 4941 - 4960 of 29,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2023, 2:14 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
However, employees often live and reside in states that are different from the company’s place of incorporation and principal place of business. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:12 am by Christopher J. Slottee
Smart held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:18 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Elections)Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He is currently living with M.H.S. and the Grandparents L.C. and L.C., although not biologically related to them. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:34 pm by John Hochfelder
The defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the pre-death conscious pain and suffering claims was granted but on appeal reinstated in Estreich v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Federal funding is available to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, and to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the counties of Aransas, Atascosa, Bee, Bexar, Brooks,… [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Shaw v. [read post]