Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm
(b); cf. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:50 am
However, I didn’t pay much attention to the new law, which would have been effective January 1, 2020 but it didn’t pass. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Dec. 640 (BIA 1962), and Matter of Mujahid, 15 I. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
I can already hear the protests of my centralizing friends who love "rights absolutism," declaring that these are matters of federal right that must be defined by federal judges. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:08 pm
Writing the Legal Costs Blog is great fun (so long as you don’t mind the hate mail, death threats and excrement shoved through the letter-box). [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Danielle B., 158 A.D.3d 767, 71 N.Y.S.3d 549 [2d Dept. 2018] and Matter of Christopher YY. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:06 am
As the court noted, to survive a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a complaint must “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:50 am
Non-parties often won’t show up at an Illinois divorce hearing because they “don’t want to get involved. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:12 am
The Introduction to the Principles explains further that “[b]ecause of its burgeoning importance, perhaps no other commercial subject matter is in greater need of harmonization and clarification. . . . [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:01 am
(b).) [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:59 pm
Ideally, you work on one matter at a time with only materials relating to that one matter on your desk. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 8:25 am
” In light of the Executive Order, the Board’s Inspector General concluded that “[t]he wholesale incorporation of the dissent in Browning-Ferris into the Hy-Brand majority decision consolidated the two cases into the same ‘particular matter involving specific parties,’” thereby rendering it problematic for the NLRB Member whose former employer represented a party in Browning-Ferris to participate in the Hy-Brand decision. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
”[14] The Release also compared the Section 404 requirements against Section 13(b)(2) by citing the Commission’s interpretive release from 1981: We have previously stated, as a matter of policy, that under Section 13(b)(2) “every public company needs to establish and maintain records of sufficient accuracy to meet adequately four interrelated objectives: appropriate reflection of corporate transactions and the disposition of assets;… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
Several solutions for b) were also considered. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Why this happened is another matter that has not been publicly explained. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
I don't have a considered view about which side of the Wisconsin Supreme Court has the better of the argument regarding the delegated authority under Section 323.12(4)(b). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
It doesn’t really matter who started to conflict – the law is clear: WHEN POLICE SAY STOP –YOU STOP! [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:12 am
If boards hadn't waited so long to consider internal pay equity, Congress probably wouldn't have felt compelled to act... [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:19 am
Edward T. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Teller, 53 P.3d 240, 249 (Haw. 2002). = = = = L·U·B·R·I·C·I·O·U·S [T]he patent fails to teach how the invention actually achieves lubriciousness. [read post]
