Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 42,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2019, 8:35 am
Carr and IPE: An Essay in Retrieval Jessica Chen Weiss & Allan Dafoe, Authoritarian Audiences, Rhetoric, and Propaganda in International Crises: Evidence from China Ches Thurber, Social Ties and the Strategy of Civil Resistance Brendan J Connell, Electoral Rules, Interest Group Pressures, and the Price of Democratic Default Ty Solomon, Rhythm and Mobilization in International Relations Sebastian Schindler & Tobias Wille, How Can We Criticize International Practices? [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 9:46 pm
On appeal, the Full Court shifted focus away from evaluating the factual correctness, or otherwise, of expert evidence (which was, inevitably, in dispute between the parties), and back to the language of the Rule.Thus, as Chief Justice Allsop stated (at paragraph [81] of the Full Court decision), ‘[i]t was not a matter of which body of expert evidence to prefer; rather, it was whether Pfizer reasonably believed that it may have a right to relief. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:13 am
" Furthermore, the evidence would not necessarily be the same in each case. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:27 am
SCOV reviews the matter for abuse of discretion, and concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its ruling. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:56 am
But that doesn't seem to matter. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 7:46 am
As the Court of Appeals says in this case, "Ordinarily, a claim should not be deemed “groundless wherethe plaintiff has made a sufficient evidentiary showing to forestall summary judgment and has presented sufficient evidence at trial to prevent the entry of judgment against him as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:05 pm
The issue arose In the Matter of the Paternity and Maternity of Infant T. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
In the end, the Superior Court ruled that the carrier was entitled to judgment in its favor on all claims presented. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:02 am
The PTO argues that GSK does not identify a specific patent application they intend to file immediately upon the implementation of the Final Rules, which the PTO offers as evidence that GSK will not experience certain harm. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:07 pm
According to the Suffolk court, there is no competent evidence to dispute plaintiff's evidence that defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs vehicle in the rear. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:56 am
That initial step taken, the Court might do well to reconsider Tanner and Warger, and empower trial judges to address other sorts of serious post-verdict allegations of bias and misconduct, either as a matter of constitutional law or as a matter of interpretation of the rather opaque language of Rule 606(b). [read post]
17 May 2016, 11:08 am
It is evident, however, that the amendments may not pass quietly. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:17 pm
If the plaintiff is unable to offer evidence sufficient to meet their burden, their claims may be dismissed, as illustrated in a recent New York ruling. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 12:11 pm
Parties can appeal jury verdicts, but they can be difficult to overturn, as demonstrated in a recent New York ruling issued in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 5:59 am
The court first ruled on the motion in limine. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:29 am
After hearing all of the evidence, the court held in favor of both the defendants, that being ICON Systems and Mine Safety Appliances. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:05 pm
Why does that matter, you ask? [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Levy said it is too soon to say whether Toney will be retried.The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:46 pm
(And that's assuming the district court rules against the government. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Both Congress and the FDA have been consistent in using the terms illness, disease, and condition interchangeably, but Judge Kacsmaryk contorts the evidence to suggest otherwise. [read post]
