Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 55,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:52 pm
By Jason Rantanen Advanced Fiber Technologies (AFT) Trust v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:37 am
Bracewell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 12:34 pm
Tr. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:06 am
Smiley v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
I'm the primary presenter on three topics: the overruling of Chevron deference in the Loper Bright case (plus a comment on the Corner Post case); the Second Amendment ruling in Rahimi and the statutory ruling on bump stocks in Garland v. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 4:09 pm
Mixing a lot of areas of practice hereSachs v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:36 pm
Here is the sbstract:In National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
Citing Littleton v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Judge Gould writes a majority opinion that concludes by saying (in the process of remanding to the district court): "[W]e do not see how it can ever be incorrect, once the Supreme Court has vacated a circuit court decision and remanded for further assessment in light of one of its decisions, for the court of appeals simply to vacate the district court’s decision and to remand for further proceedings in the light of the pertinent Supreme Court decision. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:41 am
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2009] NSWSC 1229 Judge Austin decided that ASIC had failed to prove its case against One.Tel director and joint chief executive Jodee Rich and One.Tel's finance director Mark Silbermann. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:24 am
Quarterman (05-11284) and Brewer v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In McGirt v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:18 am
In Reno v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:27 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:11 am
Justices Souter and Ginsburg dissented, insisting that the statute is unconstitutional under the Court's precedents, New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
In Williamson v. [read post]