Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 22,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2018, 8:54 am
Bianca Saad, Employment Law Subject Matter Expert CalChamber members can read more about Joint-Employer Liability in the HR Library. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
The Wet Seal Retail, Inc. is among the California state court cases adopting the holding in Iskanian. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
SEC, the case that struck down Rule 14a-11. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:00 pm
As such, the court affirmed the trial court ruling. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:05 pm
The matter went to arbitration, and the arbitrator found for the employer. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:34 am
Controlling the narrative mattered enormously. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
He submitted that the court examining a party under Order 10 Rule 2 of the Code while purporting to elucidate the matters in controversy, cannot confront the signature portion of a disputed unexhibited document by adopting the procedure of covering up the other portions of the agreement.16. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:58 am
He submitted that the court examining a party under Order 10 Rule 2 of the Code while purporting to elucidate the matters in controversy, cannot confront the signature portion of a disputed unexhibited document by adopting the procedure of covering up the other portions of the agreement. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 10:34 am
It sought to explain why the adoption of CTB amounted to a partial indirect repeal of the US subpart F rules. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
This weblog has hosted a series of posts on the subject of litigating patents under the experimental, not quite hatched but nearly-there Unified Patent Court (UPC) system that has been created for the new Europe, with its fascinating new collection of Rules [now that everyone has got used to the 17th draft of the Rules of Procedure, an 18th Draft has been more or less agreed and its adoption has been predicted for this coming December: see PatLit… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:52 am
However, the PTAB ruled (and the Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
According to the Court, the Safe Harbour is not in line with EU data protection rules. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Thus, Hall properly rejected the argument that there is a "federal rule of law implicit in the Constitution that requires all of the states to adhere to the sovereign-immunity doctrine as it prevailed when the Constitution was adopted. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
We should see one immediate decision interpreting this case — namely when the federal court case that referred the matter to the Connecticut Supreme Court for an answer to the question of whether Garcetti applied, still needs to apply the the rule to the facts. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
A unanimous ruling for the government might even be within reach. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 5:07 am
The board of directors shall also have the power, to the extent the declaration or rules and regulations duly adopted pursuant thereto expressly so provide, to . . . [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:29 am
The board of directors shall also have the power, to the extent the declaration or rules and regulations duly adopted pursuant thereto expressly so provide, to . . . [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 1:30 pm
Further, there are no provisions in the Act or the Rules that directly address the question of a stay of orders of the Full Court pending the determination of an application for special leave. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
Last week, the SEC brought an enforcement action in the perks/related-person/internal controls area – In the Matter of MusclePharm Corporation – about how a company paid the spa tab for its CEO and his spouse, etc. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:14 am
I am not sure how persuasive an argument this will be, given the decades of regulatory rulings the argument challenges. [read post]
