Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The" Results 4941 - 4960 of 8,607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 9:57 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Following is an excerpt from the blog post: On May 21, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a memorandum discussing a new agreement between NLRB and OSHA regarding a backdoor route for employees to file safety related whistleblower claims that are too stale to be filed with OSHA. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:49 am by Epstein Becker Green
Following is an excerpt from the blog post: On May 21, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a memorandum discussing a new agreement between NLRB and OSHA regarding a backdoor route for employees to file safety related whistleblower claims that are too stale to be filed with OSHA. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:47 am by Epstein Becker Green
Following is an excerpt from the blog post: On May 21, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a memorandum discussing a new agreement between NLRB and OSHA regarding a backdoor route for employees to file safety related whistleblower claims that are too stale to be filed with OSHA. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by Epstein Becker Green
Following is an excerpt from the blog post: On May 21, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a memorandum discussing a new agreement between NLRB and OSHA regarding a backdoor route for employees to file safety related whistleblower claims that are too stale to be filed with OSHA. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:30 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
On May 21, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a memorandum discussing a new agreement between NLRB and OSHA regarding a backdoor route for employees to file safety related whistleblower claims that are too stale to be filed with OSHA. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Andrew Pincus
  The same is true in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm by Tom McCarthy and Samuel B. Gedge
Detroit Board of Education, the Court identified two state interests sufficiently compelling to justify mandatory union fees – “labor peace” and the related interest in preventing nonunion workers from free-riding on the union’s statutorily mandated duty to represent all unit members fairly. [read post]
The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the owner violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
The Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (PLRA) authorizes state employees to join labor unions and to bargain collectively, and provides for a union to be recognized if designated as the representative of the majority of public employees in an appropriate bargaining unit. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:49 am by Tom Smith
Obama struck an aggressive tone in the face of a lawsuit threat from House Speaker John Boehner and in the wake of two defeats before the Supreme Court, including a unanimous decision from the court that he overreached when he appointed members of the National Labor Relations Board while the Senate was in recess. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
At Newsweek, Pema Levy suggests that the Court’s decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the owner violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Noel Canning the Supreme Court unanimously invalidated President Obama’s appointment, in early 2012, of three members of the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:48 pm by Pamela Wolf
In that regard, and in the face of a Republican Party determined to reduce the NLRB to a toothless body, I believe President Obama did the right thing in using recess authority to appoint members to the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm by Kevin Walsh
 Unlike last week’s surprisingly unanimous decisions in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
On January 4, 2012, President Obama used recess appointments to name three members to the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
In light of the state’s minimal control over personal assistants, the Illinois State Labor Relations Board held in 1985 that personal assistants weren’t state employees. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:02 am by James J. La Rocca
Noel Canning, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously decided that President Obama’s purported “recess” appointments of National Labor Relations Board members on January 4, 2012 violated the Constitution because the Senate was not on a break of “sufficient length” when the President appointed them, and thus the President could not dispense with Senate consent of the appointments. [read post]