Search for: "North v. State"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 13,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Who Has Standing to Apply for Custody in NC? – Part 3: When the Best Interest Standard Doesn’t Apply
29 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
This is the situation that the North Carolina Supreme Court had to address in 2003 in the case of Owenby v. [read post]
Who Has Standing to Apply for Custody in NC? – Part 3: When the Best Interest Standard Doesn’t Apply
29 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
This is the situation that the North Carolina Supreme Court had to address in 2003 in the case of Owenby v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Sabrina McCubbin posted the court documents from the consolidated cases under Dalmazzi v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Frank Adams v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:12 am
Perry, from 1974, and Menna v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
In the case of Clark v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:17 pm
The suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this proclamation shall NOT apply to: (i) any lawful permanent resident of the United States; (ii) any foreign national who is admitted to or paroled into the United States on or after the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation—September 24, 2017; (iii) any foreign national who has a document other than a visa — such as a transportation letter, an appropriate… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
Certainly it prevents those individuals travelling to the United States on a North Korean passport. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In 2003, LegalZoom received a “cease and desist” order from the North Carolina State Bar on the basis that its non-licensed “legal technicians” were actively involved in document review and preparation.[12] The Missouri Federal Court later upheld the order on a motion for summary judgment, agreeing that LegalZoom’s platform went beyond a “do-it-yourself” service and crossed the boundary of unauthorized practice.[13] The result of the… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
Pesticide Action Network North America v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
Pesticide Action Network North America v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm
Out of necessity, the challengers will have to contend that the policy is subject to what amounts to a “forever taint,” as Supreme Court Justice David Souter labeled it in McCreary County v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm
§ 1152(a)(1)(B), which permits the secretary of state to set “procedures” for visa issuance. [read post]
