Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 4941 - 4960 of 28,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
Denial of Correction Officer’s Performance of Duty Retirement Benefits Annulled Due to Factual Errors - Matter of Paul Mazzotte v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner was a correction officer for over 20 years. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Rather, the claim seems to me that he was in the same building and thus likely to be passing closely by employees on various occasions (coming to and from work or to and from lunch, meeting with people, and so on). [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 7:58 am by Giles Peaker
The cost of remedial works done would be about £72,000 per leaseholder if passed on. ii) The lease clauses and statute. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
As we shall show, employers should be wary of Title V because, if this title were passed as a standalone act, or tacked onto (even in pieces) must-pass legislation in the Democratic-controlled house and a (post-filibuster) Democratic-controlled Senate, it would dramatically expand potential employer liability, create new penalties, and increase compliance obligations involving I-9 and E-Verify employment eligibility verification. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
As we shall show, employers should be wary of Title V because, if this title were passed as a standalone act, or tacked onto (even in pieces) must-pass legislation in the Democratic-controlled house and a (post-filibuster) Democratic-controlled Senate, it would dramatically expand potential employer liability, create new penalties, and increase compliance obligations involving I-9 and E-Verify employment eligibility verification. [read post]
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in the class action certification case of TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"If the arbitration agreement is valid, any controversy as to the validity of the contract as a whole passes to the arbitrators" (id.). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"If the arbitration agreement is valid, any controversy as to the validity of the contract as a whole passes to the arbitrators" (id.). [read post]