Search for: "People v David S." Results 4941 - 4960 of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am by David Pocklington
He therefore submitted a petition, signed by a number of people who put their names to a statement in support [7]. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
See Alcohol Problems and Solutions, David J. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm by lawmrh
And so Conservative barista Charles Krauthammer, almost 40 years later – - – still calls the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court rulings on flawed jury instructions used prior to 1991.The 5-4 decision did not affect Hood's 1990 conviction in the shooting death of two people in Plano. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
III The usual suspects Guatemala’s Catholic clergy and its human rights groups have long enjoyed the reputation of David fighting Goliath. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
David Canton foresaw this issue as a key one for 2017 in his new year’s predictions on Slaw.ca: Another AI issue we will hear about in 2017 is embedded bias and discrimination. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Mr Lambert was widely quoted at the time as saying that the borough’s 41 privately-operated care homes were failing to protect the young people they are looking after. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
            Governor David Paterson's legal counsel, David Nocenti, advised the governor of these developments and recommended that in light of this rapidly expanding body of judicial decisions, it was prudent to get out in front of the issue and get all the state executive agencies on the same page, to avoid unnecessary and unproductive litigation. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:56 pm by Rick
Any reader who lives in a place like New York City or Joe Arpaio's county in Arizona is simply going to be outvoted by people who love the thug tactics those cops use. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 1:41 am
In conclusion, Jacoby discussed tarnishment, in the form of Anheuser-Busch v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Overall, though, the panelists seemed more interested in the public’s reaction to the Court’s apparent politically motivated decisions rather than to changes in the Court’s composition. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
"  And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]