Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 55,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Federal theory in the twentieth century is first developed by institutionalist political scientists, such as Kenneth Wheare, who took the American federation as a lodestar.[8] Thus, the result of Texas v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Following its advice, a 10-year-old girl who asked for a challenge was told to poke metal into a power outlet, [BBC News]. 2. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
One cannot answer that question strictly as a matter of public policy because the First Amendment right to free speech places limits on government’s power to make lying a crime.In United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Desde La Habana, el sacerdote de Ifá, Víctor Betancourt, dijo que la oficialista Asociación Cultural Yoruba rompió con los acuerdos establecidos desde 2016 y este año hicieron la ceremonia "a puerta cerrada, sin convocar a nadie de la comisión". [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 5:54 pm
Here's the abstract: Extraterritoriality is a challenging concept as a matter of international law and policy, raising fundamental questions about the allocation of power among States. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
There are no interim injunction powers for urgent issues, of course. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:24 am
Related Cases: Hachette v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:16 am
The internet can be a powerful tool for communicating, collaborating, and finding community. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
(D.); VillaromanR. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
“The Supreme Court exercises immense power to issue decisions that affect and bind all Americans,” Dellinger wrote. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 2:51 pm
., Raboya v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
Co. v Beau Rivage Rest., 121 AD2d 98, 101; see also Flex-O-Vit USA v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 281 AD2d 980, 981). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
Likewise, in R.A.V. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Here’s a snippet from that exclusive interview:“V: Why don’t we start … by asking what got you involved in acting? [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 3:22 pm
The rule also purports to provide additional guidance as to the extent to which (in view of the two agencies) wetlands near or adjacent to navigable waters are subject to regulation as part of the "waters of the United States," a question currently before the Court in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
Clifford v Grosvenor West End, Central London County Court 12 December 2022(?) [read post]
