Search for: "President v. State"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 22,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
” None of them asked that precise question, but the President himself gave a chilling answer when he proposed the ban: Korematsu v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:28 am
United States of America) (Mexico v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 am
California v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 am
The political debate was further fueled by the 1970 Supreme Court case Oregon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:15 am
EST in one of the most high-profile cases of the term: Fulton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm
United States Supreme Court – KING ET AL. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:52 am
Scheich made to an ABC News reporter about the Charney v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:08 pm
Reade is slated to take over the case of U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
Abbott demanded that President Biden immediately address a "dire border crisis" caused by many thousands of migrants illegally crossing the border. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The US had submitted a brief, I believe, for restructuring Mississippi higher eduction according to the principle of Green v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm
Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:51 pm
Vice President Kamala Harris also issued a statement (full text) criticizing the decision.Meanwhile, in State of Washington v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
All casebooks will prominently feature discussions of the ambiguous passages in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 11:50 am
Connecticut), federal treatment of gay married couples (Windsor v. [read post]
