Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 18,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 10:01 pm
The case is National Energy Regulator of South Africa and Another v PG Group (Pty) Limited and Others. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:39 pm
The case is Cengage Learning Inc v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:55 am
In Section V, I take the argument from social valuation to its conclusion that the inequalities of condition caused by market prices are a necessary feature of the Paretian interpretation of the principle of responsibility in any feasible or sustainable economic system. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Where the main issue in the litigation was the reasonableness of individual charges for hospital services, the Southern District found most of the requirements for class certification lacking.In Colomar v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:42 am
Feed In Tariff: California CPUC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:49 pm
Increased Regulatory Scrutiny and Class Actions for Representations Involving Price). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:51 pm
Increased Regulatory Scrutiny and Class Actions for Representations Involving Price). [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 12:17 pm
The Hawaii case, Travelocity.com, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
However, the purchaser did not allege the price she paid for the products, their price generally, or the price of comparable products. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:25 am
Mayo sought to offer a competing blood test at a lower price. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:48 am
Sure enough, the core issue is price; 90% or even 99% of the patent disputes are about price. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
See Hy Cite Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
. would yield truly enormous profits if those prices were actually paid. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:26 am
People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:43 am
Deep Blue or Ken Jennings v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
Fund v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
An investigation of the mis-selling found that Sureterm had unfairly increased the price between quotation and sale in 28,775 instances of a total of 81,002 sales. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am
May 19, 2016) (notice of removal of putative class action alleging defendant internet providers’ “Price for Life” promotion was misleading because the providers’ price guarantee expired after one year). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
