Search for: "Samples v. Samples" Results 4941 - 4960 of 5,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2023, 12:15 pm by Kelly Lavelle
TAR has been accepted by the U.S. courts since the seminal 2012 decision in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:42 pm
Many of the cases reviewed were the ones that have been summarized in previous posts to this blog, such as the excess insurance case of Kropa v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:49 am by Simon Lester
In the order they will appear in this working paper, our main concerns are:  There is a lack of adequate sample composition and size to conduct rigorous empirical work from which an analyst could draw such bold lessons. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:56 am by Barry Barnett
Louis from 2015-22 and awards $1,785,310,872 in overcharge damages. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_burnett-v-natl-assn-of-realtors-verdict-activity-7125211587996442625-XMFc? [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
The HOA’s management should routinely follow-up with the HOA’s landscape maintenance crew to monitor the slope, v-ditch (concrete channel usually at the bottom of a hill to collect drainage) and other drainage routes, and water pipelines. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Characterization of these layers will require analysis of samples and calibration of key instruments. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:09 am by Scott Bomboy
The primary constitutional question debated at the Court on Tuesday in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:23 pm by Monica Williamson
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Here's a sample of what happened:Krist also testified that there were incidents in which [restaurant owners] Batas or Michael Kolombos "yelled" at her. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:17 am
The case is HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat). [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court ruled that judges rather than juries should determine whether or not pharmaceutical product liability claims may proceed under the “clear evidence” standard established in Wyeth v. [read post]