Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 4941 - 4960 of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
In short, the company is only an attractive investment without the unions. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In short, the Justices have a chance to reexamine the core of the landmark 1976 ruling in Buckley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am by Gillian Metzger
  This is true of both Oil States Energy Services. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
Wurie, No. 13–212, the United States Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit went the opposite way and suppressed evidence from a warrantless cell phone search incident to arrest.There is no controlling precedent in this circuit. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 11:15 am by Marina Wilson
It currently still holds 6.72% of the search market share in the United States, followed by Yahoo at 2.92%. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Eugene Volokh
According to plaintiffs, the LESMC "denounces capitalism, the nuclear family, and the territorial integrity of the lower 48 states of the United States[,]" and is designed "to expunge the idea of Zionism, and the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel, from the public square[.] [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am by SHG
 Shortly after its passage, the Supreme Court held that the Amendment “is not a mere prohibition of State laws establishing or upholding slavery, but an absolute declaration that slavery or involuntary servitude shall not exist in any part of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has covered the Department of Justice’s plans to restrict the encryption of communications data. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
That's why "Never Too Late" has been designed: in just a short number of minutes you can see at a glance what substantive Katposts you missed last week. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:23 pm by WIMS
; How much oil does the United States consume? [read post]