Search for: "State v. Tech"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 5,373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (Retaliation)Cavalier v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 8:32 pm
The argument will be held in Ivy Hall, at Ivy Tech, in Lafayette.At 10 a.m. on Tuesday, April 21, the Indiana Court of Appeals will hear argument in Jennings Water, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
" Interwave Tech., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:24 am
(NB: here's the one 9th Cir. data breach case I'm aware of: Stollenwerk v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
" Symbol Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:32 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
I think not.]Proposes best practices for Library 2.0[Faustian bargain with tech can't be as bad as the deal we've got with vendors, can it?] [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:32 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:30 am
"); Southwall Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:43 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 9:41 am
He was the second leader of the State Bar of Wisconsin Technology Resource Committee (now defunct, but which was partly responsible for the Wisconsin Bar getting an early national reputation as being tech-forward. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Louis, IS & M Ry Co v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
As such, any failure to mark was irrelevant to the defendant's counterclaims of infringement, and the district court's summary judgment on this issue was reversed as well.More detail of Crown Packaging Tech., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
The most interesting and talked about case in the 230 immunity area is Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
