Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 4941 - 4960 of 10,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
California satisfies the requirement for a defendant to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require reappointment of counsel to file a motion for new trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:49 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
Source: How to Use a Court Interpreter, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, pamphlet in English and Spanish, undated. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:05 am by Steven G. Pearl
After a hearing, the SPB denied the appeal, concluding that Furtado was not qualified for the correctional lieutenant position, and that the Department properly demoted him to a non-peace officer position.Furtado then filed a petition for writ of mandate in the Superior Court, which was denied. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:00 am by Victoria Pynchon
In a tersely worded announcement on the Los Angeles Superior Court’s “Update” website, the largest court system in the world describes drastic immediate cutbacks that could bring the delivery of justice to a trickle if not a complete collapse. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:41 am
The law took effect on January 1 and will apply to scores earned during the February 9 LSAT sitting.The council filed suit on January 4 in Sacramento County, Calif., Superior Court, seeking to block its enforcement. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:30 am by Michael B. Stack
    The California Department of Insurance recently reported that Jerry Buffington, 69, and Cynthia Russell, 47, offered guilty pleas in Kern County Superior Court to a single count each of workers compensation insurance premium fraud, along with eight counts each of tax evasion. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
John's Anglican Church, Petaluma (Sonoma County Superior Court; parties agreed to settle following California Supreme Court decision, parish moved to another location and is now a member of ACNA); (Diocese of Northern California was plaintiff)11. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:07 am by Kevin
In a development that shocked no one, including him, Jonathan Frieman did not prevail yesterday in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 10:47 am
In the case, In re David R., the Second Appellate District overturned an order from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County which stated that a two-year-old child, David, should be made a dependent of the court. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Ruling that the public interest in shielding children from sexual abuse trumps individuals' privacy rights, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Emilie H. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:26 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
Electronic service is a cost-effective manner of service, whether done in Federal cases with CM/ECF, or in California superior courts by stipulation, or in conjunction with electronic filing. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The Court ruled that such potentially feasible alternatives should have been presented to LAFCO for consideration in the EIR, rather than rejected out of hand based on what it characterized as unsupported speculation that they would not yield environmentally superior results. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  ZonePerfect argued that the 30-day notice required prior to the commencement of a CLRA action for damages came too late because plaintiffs sent a demand letter on August 30, 2011 but then filed suit in California Superior Court on September 14, 2011. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Grace Feldman
The California Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:02 am by Brian M. Wright
But bad drafting meant that an assumed source of revenue for the crime victims compensation account—a percentage of superior court-imposed criminal fines—never materialized, leaving a $670,000 hole in an annual budget of $2.7 million.[6] Unfortunately, in addition to severing the CVCP’s source of revenue, the legislature also drastically reduced the benefits available to crime victims. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am by Andrew Trask
But I've spoken to a number of California lawyers--plaintiff and defense--who considered this ruling to be a bombshell. [read post]