Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE" Results 4941 - 4960 of 5,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Erin Miller
The Court heard argument yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:32 am
Last Act: 02/23/10 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCES6902 VALESKY -- Requires the removal or covering of inapplicable highway work zone traffic control signs No Same asBLURB : V & T L. removal work zone signs Last Act: 02/23/10 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATIONLast Action Date: 02/24/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:06 pm by lawmrh
See Wilcox charges tossed; Thomas disqualified The circus is still in town. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:30 am
State Funding for Interdistrict Magnet Schools - 2010-R-0056On July 9, 1996, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the racial, economic, and ethnic isolation in the Hartford school district and those of its surrounding towns violated Connecticut's constitution and ordered the state to remedy that violation (Sheff v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm by Kevin Sheerin
Hulse v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller In 2001, petitioner, a 20-year old police officer for the Town of Ramapo Police Department, injured his back while lifting a large person to perform CPR. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
Such a tariff or equivalent mechanism would never get off the ground in the USA for many reasons, including that state sovereign immunity is well established by the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
By Kate Hart In a decision filed on February 11, 2009, Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
Distinguishing between an individual’s “domicile” and his or her “residence” for the purpose of meeting a “residence requirement” for employmentMatter of Ball v City of Syracuse, 2010 NY Slip Op 01037, decided on February 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Syracuse City Charter provides that employees "shall be at the time of their appointment and continue to be during their continuance in the employment of the city, residents of… [read post]