Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
But how should the Supreme Court of the United States resolve that question? [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:55 pm
Specifically, it found that “Paragraph O constituted Petitioner's ex ante consent to Respondent's return to the United States, consent which is not rendered inoperable by Petitioner's ex post regret that he permitted Respondent to relocate his children to the United States under the terms of the court-ordered April 2011 Separation Agreement. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm
Mendoza at the United States/Mexico border in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, the case was before the district court on Ms. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
She stated, however, that because she was not required to do so by the Family Code at this time that she was declining to provide any values for now. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm
Millemann Over the last 15 years, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has issued many business method patents. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit eviscerated one of the few rights of that Slaughter-House affirmed as among the “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States”: the right “to use the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:52 am
The United States Court of Appeals reversed a district court ruling that ordered cancellation of registrations for the marks LOVELYSKIN and LOVELYSKIN.COM for skin care products and online retail services. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
Again, the strong reliance on those requirements is a bold move; the argument on this point closely resembles the argument that the United States presented in Mayo to no avail. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Because the tax code treats the inherited IRA so differently from traditional retirement funds, it produces a more coherent regime reading across the entire United States Code to use that as the line of demarcation defining “retirement funds” in the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
The Petitioners (the survivors) challenged the arbitrary damage caps of 766.118 by appealing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:13 pm
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
The remained in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
Specifically, the applicable law states that “[a]n inter partes review may not be instituted if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent”.1 Similarly, the corresponding rule states that “[a] person may file a petition for Inter Partes Review unless: ... more … [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINACERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 12–138. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
