Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 4941 - 4960
of 8,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
And so the Guatemalan army carried out what may have been the most brutal counterinsurgency campaign in Latin America. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, the United States House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act by a vote of 325-91. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
To switch gears from the First Amendment to Article One, a comparable switch may well occur when the subject turns to the constitutionality of Congressional-executive agreements that serve as the modern vehicle for committing America to international free-trade regimes. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:21 am
Fardon, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; Robert J. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:04 am
In Baker v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:33 am
We went so completely mental yesterday about the FBI's Wanted posters in our China cyber-spy indictment (aka WangGate) summary that we forgot to link to the indictment itself which, we should add, is an exemplary piece of legal writing. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm
United States Department of Justice Judicial Watch’s request was filed under FOIA, a federal law that took effect in 1967. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm
Related articles 60 Years After ‘Brown,’ What Still Divides America’s Classrooms? [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:28 am
In Bullard v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:45 pm
Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby’s interpretation that it does would open the floodgates to exempt every business owner in the United States from the anti-discrimination laws, because there is no real middle ground. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:33 pm
On 9 May 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued its opinion in Oracle America, Inc v Google Inc. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:54 pm
United States, 234 U.S. 600 (1914). [read post]
