Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4941 - 4960 of 7,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
Any State Party to the present Covenant availing itself of the right of derogation shall immediately inform the other States Parties to the present Covenant, through the intermediary of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, of the provisions from which it has derogated and of the reasons by which it was actuated. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm by Venkat
Twitter could have reduced its need to be the instrument of government censorship by keeping its assets and personnel within the borders of the United States, where legal protections exist like CDA 230 and the DMCA safe harbors (which do require takedowns but also give a path, albeit a lousy one, for republication). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by The Law Office of Nancy King
The minority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alioto went further, stating that the gathering of information via the GPS unit constituted a violation of privacy. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm by Steven Schwinn
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
But Chief Judge Roberts has previously voted against government interference in the marketplace of idea in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Only one member of today’s majority has to adopt the view that the “search” of installing the GPS is sufficiently minor to not require a warrant. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]