Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 16,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 10:15 am
" "Now that a court of appeal has rejected the government's arguments supporting its secret shift to mass surveillance, we look forward to other courts—including the Ninth Circuit in EFF's Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court opined that as probationary employee, Plaintiff "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that ... her dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law", citing Smith v New York City Department of Corrections, 292 AD2d 198. [read post]
10 May 2019, 10:53 am
Smith w/Hawkins & Vratil). [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:38 am
The proposed tort in Smith v Fonterra with reference to France and the Netherlands Paula Leskinen, Antti Belinskij, & Sanna-Riikka Saarela, Integrating climate change into legislative drafting: An analysis of regulatory impact assessment obligations and practices in the EU and Finland Saga Eriksson, The centrality of law for EU sustainable finance markets: Outlining a research agenda Wen Duan, Area-based management tools under the BBNJ Agreement: Ambition or illusion?… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:39 am
Some extra points:The Supreme Court case is Stokes v Christian Brothers High School [2015] IESC 13. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Smith, God, Caesar, and Darwin: Parameters and Perimeters of The Town Hall, (2020).James May & Erin Daly, Why Dignity Rights Matter, (19 European Human Rights L. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Beck of the Reed Smith law office in Philadelphia for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:46 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
In the case of Ruffing v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
Smith w/Ikuta & Steele). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court opined that as probationary employee, Plaintiff "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that ... her dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law", citing Smith v New York City Department of Corrections, 292 AD2d 198. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 am
V. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:58 am
Smith, 333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:15 pm
As the 2d DCA recently held in Smith v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
In the separate decision of Wilson v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:46 pm
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Papin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
The July 16 opinion in Freedman v. [read post]
