Search for: "Antonin Scalia" Results 4961 - 4980 of 6,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 3:09 am by Dan Filler
  But can we really say that Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia didn't get an adequate legal education? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis Two days after winding up, quite angrily, on the losing end of a major criminal law ruling, Justice Antonin Scalia moved energetically on Wednesday to try to make sure it does not happen again — at least not in the next case up on the same issue. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by Lyle Denniston
” Justice Antonin Scalia framed the issue simply: either what Ashcroft allegedly did with the law “is a core prosecutorial function or it is not,’ and, if it is not, what difference does it make which kind of immunity should follow? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Yesterday, in an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
 Here is the abstract: Justice Antonin Scalia recently declared that the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause simply does not apply to discrimination based on sex or sexual orientation. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:34 am
Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:18 am by Lyle Denniston
The outcome of the case drew unanimous support among the Justices (except that Justice Elena Kagan did not take part), but the reasoning used in a majority opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia was not supported by two of the Justices — Samuel A. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:35 am by Ashby Jones
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a scathing dissent, calling the majority’s reasoning “so transparently false that professing to believe it demeans this institution. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:42 am by SHG
  This was rejected in Crawford, where Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the promise of confrontation in the 6th Amendment could not be judicially wiped away by perceived reliability, and was, by constitutional mandate, subject to the crucible of cross-examination. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It has not been an easy judicial task: just this week, Justice Antonin Scalia — the most fervent supporter of the Crawford principle — lashed out bitterly in dissent when the majority created a new exception to this Sixth Amendment confrontation right, in Michigan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:50 pm
"Supreme Court says dying victim's statement can be used in court; The 6-2 Supreme Court ruling breaks somewhat from recent rulings forbidding the use of 'hearsay' statements to police, creating a new rule for when officers are dealing with 'an ongoing emergency'; The decision, says Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissent, leaves the Constitution 'in shambles'": David G. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:32 pm
And Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Gibsburg each issued dissenting opinions. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:18 am by Bob Kraft
" In an opinion for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, "The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 'reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.'" But, "Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, saying the threat of lawsuits provides an incentive for vaccine manufacturers to constantly monitor and improve their… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:10 am by Bob Kraft
” In an opinion for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, “The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 ‘reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm by Ashby Jones
According to the Post: The letter, to the House and Senate Judiciary committees, comes after recent controversies involving travel and appearances at political events by several Supreme Court justices, including Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:43 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Kochophobia rages on, and these furious minds seem to imagine themselves overcoming the evil that is Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — as if their "ethics" plan — assuming it could be put in place — couldn't possibly backfire and oust their favorite liberal/swing justice. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Brian Wolfman
One concern is the recent attendance of Supreme Court justices at events sponsored by conservative groups: The group's appeal on Wednesday, in a letter to the House and Senate Judiciary committees, comes after recent controversies involving travel and appearances at political events by several Supreme Court justices, including Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm by Brooks Holland - Guest
Justice Antonin Scalia questioned the value of the Court deciding the motion time question at all if it were to affirm the judgment on other grounds. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:09 pm by Ashby Jones
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the court, said the vaccine law “pre-empts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs who seek compensation for injury or death caused by vaccine side effects. [read post]