Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 4961 - 4980 of 14,594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court on Oct. 16, 2017, announced it had granted the government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 11:04 am by Steven Cohen
Plaintiffs sued defendant, stating that they should bear the costs of two accidents that occurred when a barge struck to bridges on the Mississippi River. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(c) The bearing, if any, the criminal offense or offenses for which the person was previously convicted will have on his fitness or ability to perform one or more such duties or responsibilities. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(c) The bearing, if any, the criminal offense or offenses for which the person was previously convicted will have on his fitness or ability to perform one or more such duties or responsibilities. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(c) The bearing, if any, the criminal offense or offenses for which the person was previously convicted will have on his fitness or ability to perform one or more such duties or responsibilities. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
These approaches can vary from those that would posit state constitutional supremacy the governs all political organs, even if the political organs themselves are responsible for the state constitution’s provisions, to variations on notions of the autonomy of the state constitution to which all other institution creating governance systems are bound. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:09 am
The Claimant has, in the current state,  no right to claim recall and destruction of the infringing products. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was described by the Court in Multani v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
  Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]