Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 9,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
The parties in Capitol Records v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Patten LJ (who gave the lead judgment) stated that where a company makes a claim for losses suffered by it as a result of the conduct of a fraudulent director, it does not matter if the company was the intended primary or secondary victim of the fraud. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
With its recent decision in Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Gingery v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Then, in Gebser v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 11:49 am
In Chelsea Grand, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am
So, for the first time after two and a half years, a “partial general approach” was reached on this issue and others contained in chapter V of the regulation. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:45 pm
In Brenner v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
A notable exception was the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
That was the question facing the Illinois Supreme Court last month in Bettis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
Regardless, it is now clear that many states are interested in just what consideration at-will employees must receive to be bound by post-termination non-competes. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
The other, which has gotten less attention [though Jon Adler did have a pointer to it here on the VC last week], is the DC Circuit’s decision to enter a default judgment against the government of North Korea in Kim v Democratic Republic of North Korea. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
State, 432 S.W.3d 563 (Ark. 2014). [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Some may recall that Judge Buckley was the lead plaintiff challenging federal regulation of campaign finance in Buckley v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:19 am
It stated (among other things) that all users of the employer’s computer systems were bound by it, that emails would be monitored, including for investigations, and should not be assumed to be private. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sheppard v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:21 am
Human Rights Act (DCHRA), as well several state law claims. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
In City of Providence v. [read post]
