Search for: "Church v. Church" Results 4961 - 4980 of 7,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 7:35 am by Bill
I'm holding some papers in the ABC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:01 am
US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit: Byrne v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:30 pm by Corey Brettschneider
At oral argument in the Fourth Circuit travel ban case, the ASG argued that Mandel offers an alternative to cases like Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am by John Jascob
FMR LLC (2014)), limited its reach (rejecting a broad reading of its anti-shredding provision in Yates v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by MBettman
Grace Brethern Church of Delaware, Ohio, 2014-1953 (argued December 15, 2015) State of Ohio v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island v Innis, 446 US 291,… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:20 am by Morris Turek
  Yep, a church based in Kansas City has been calling itself the “International House of Prayer” since approximately 1999 and uses the acronym IHOP in connection with its religious prayer services. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm
This is another of the judgments the Lords gave on super-Wednesday at the end of July, and is worth a look because of the way their Lordships deal with the question of religious discrimination. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
Title: Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
First Evangelical Lutheran Church of Houston, 235 S.W.3d 811, 815 (Tex. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
The spotlight stays on the high-profile union-fees case that will be argued this month, Janus v. [read post]