Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 48,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2024, 9:52 pm
Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:14 pm
On page 10, Justice Grimes' opinion says: "Plaintiffs argue that fee and cost awards are not mandatory where a plaintiff has dismissed the special motion to strike before it was heard. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Then Calvo files a motion for costs, which is (of course) disputed, but he gets nearly all his costs awarded. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:31 pm
If so, the cost/benefit analysis for plaintiffs’ lawyers who might consider bringing such claims changes to the worse for them; it becomes harder, and riskier, to try to obtain a settlement or recover a verdict. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 2:45 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that if the plaintiffs are indeed indigent and can't pay the up-front costs, then defendants can either (1) pay those costs for 'em, or (2) waive their right to arbitrate.The only alternative would be to hold that an attorney can protect its own (potential) misconduct by including an expensive arbitration provision that he knew the clients could never employ given its expense. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:58 am
In PSEG Power New York, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:36 pm
In today’s case (Olson v. [read post]
Weighing the Burden, Court Excuses Plaintiff from Reviewing Millions of Pages from Unallocated Space
22 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
I-Med Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:47 am
Minox Equities Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In the published portion of Litwin v. iRenew Bio Energy Solutions LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (May 28, 2014), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) reversed final approval of a class action settlement because the notice informed the class members that if they wished to object, they (or their counsel) must appear in person at the final approval hearing. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:31 pm
It seems like I've been writing and speaking on Hunter v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:21 am
On November 1, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:23 am
The Hearing Office had held, unsurprisingly, that Knight’s own skull device mark was invalid and he was ordered to pay costs. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In Moss v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:53 am
ODPI has this post on the oral arguments in Cooey v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Wells v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Wells v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Wells v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm
Prior to the 2021 decision in Google v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
