Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 5,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:01 am
While it remains unclear whether the blocking statute has any teeth, a December 2021 European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling in Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
ADB Interest, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm
Hence, the introduction of the death penalty in drug laws was seen as a convenient tool to instil fear in drug suppliers and, rather hopefully, deter them from carrying out their trade.Suffice it to say, this framing dominated the political space from the 1970s to 1989s: that the mandatory death penalty was a necessary evil needed to combat drug offences. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
All right -- normally I do not engage laypersons who are ignorant of the law, but in this case (because so many people are being misled), I shall make an exception to that policy. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am
However, the existence of the PI also deterred other companies from entering the market with generic quetiapine. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court of Minnesota, sitting in its capacity as the institution that is responsible for enforcing the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, which you can access here. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
Even if the target of an AITP identifies the ruse, he might still be deterred from further outreach efforts to actual extremists. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:53 am
Here is much of the opinion from an interesting libel case of his, Bustos v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The new chief of the Antitrust Division, Christine Varney, today published an advance text of a speech she gave yesterday at the Center for American Progress. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:33 pm
.- eBay, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:04 am
Elrod v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
’ One Law For All goes further and argues that the mere existence of sharia councils as a socially accepted alternative may deter women from pursuing their husbands at civil law. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Its social network has vastly more users than Google+ (800 million v 62 million, but even larger lead in active users), and, in most respects, more social functionality. [read post]
