Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 4961 - 4980 of 41,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 5:24 pm by Bill Marler
The number of ill people reported from each state is as follows: Arizona (10), California (31), Illinois (1), Mississippi (1), New Mexico (6), South Dakota (1), Virginia (1), Washington (1), and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
The number of ill people reported from each state is as follows: Arizona (10), California (31), Illinois (1), Mississippi (1), New Mexico (6), South Dakota (1), Virginia (1), Washington (1), and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm by Ronald F. Wick
The court determined that while it would be unreasonable to require Sprint to compile a full list of class members over the 10-year class period because it would require 6-12 months of work and cost at least $1 million, Sprint’s records showed that Sprint could potentially identify subsets of customers who were members of the class. [read post]
7 May 2019, 10:32 am by Jeremy Saland
Understanding the Statute: What is Illegal and Impermissible You are guilty of Penal Law 245.15, pursuant to subsection (1)(a), if you intend to cause any degree of harm to your target’s emotional, financial or physical welfare. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
While we do not disregard terrorism as a legitimate threat to the security of the United States, we believe the K-1 visa does not pose a risk to the safety of United States citizens. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:27 pm
You can read the text of SB 1 at:[www.legis.state.ga.us]SB 1 is effective on July 1, 2008 and does the following things:Reinstates all of the same residence restrictions as were in effect under HB 1059, with the following exceptions for some homeowners. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm by emagraken
 The Respondents opposed arguing that this requirement does not apply to Petitions but only to “an action“. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  In relation to Article 10 she concluded that it “does not apply to create a presumptive right for any person to film the proceedings” [67]. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
As a provision for establishing standards for granting temporary relief in such circumstances, the Section is concerned about the use of the word “prohibited” (禁止) in Article 10 without limit, and the apparent overbreadth of other parts of that Article. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
Does the Regulation, in particular Articles 3(c), 3(d) and/or 13(1) of the Regulation preclude the proprie [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:02 am by Darrin Mish
Even the rich and famous does not escape the taxman. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:55 am by Darrin Mish
Even the rich and famous does not escape the taxman. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:16 pm by Jeff Gittins
S.B. 101 makes technical revisions to sections 73-3-10, 73-3-18, 73-3-20, and 73-5-13. [read post]