Search for: "Early v. Doe" Results 4961 - 4980 of 11,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
 This Kat was prowling around the site in the hope that perhaps some careless bureaucrat had inadvertently posted tomorrow's ruling in Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay a day early. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:11 pm by B.W. Barnett
Building upon our prior opinion in Jaubert v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Second, Section 3 does not to me seem to add any additional registration requirements that would violate the applicable conflict preemption standards (see Hines v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
This morning the IPKat rejoices that the wait is over for the initially expedited and subsequently delayed Opinion of the Advocate General in Joined Cases C-236 to 238/08 Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) in June of last year. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
On December 7, the Court will hear argument in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
The ISP ex parte process was unsuccessfully challenged in 3 cases in Manhattan federal court in early 2006: Atlantic v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: Does this destroy the ability to price discriminate? [read post]