Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 11,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 322 The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal regarding whether the requirement of an English test for those spouses or civil partners of a British citizen wishing to stay in the UK breached their partner’s rights under the ECHR, art 8, finding that the Rule itself does not infringe art 8, but it invites further submissions from the parties on whether a declaration should be made that the operation of the guidance in its present form is… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 1:32 pm
Here’s Blacklock’s activity to date in the Federal Court, in indicating 13 copyright infringement actions since June of 2014.BTW, the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines "litany" in part as:litany /0ˈlɪt(ə)ni/ noun. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
As part of its anniversary celebrations, the ICLR had invited its subscribers to nominate the fifteen most important cases to reach the English courts in the 150 years since its inception. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Allied Old English, Inc., 831 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
On Wednesday 18 November it will hand down judgment in R (Ali & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department regarding whether the requirement of an English test for those spouses or civil partners of a British citizen wishing to stay in the UK breached their partner’s rights under the ECHR, art 8, or whether the interference is proportionate to the aims of improving immigrants’ job prospects and ability to access health services. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:26 am
The employer’s motion to dismiss was denied in part (Mercado v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
On 11 November 2015, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the appeals of Bates v Weston; and Leeds United Football v Weston [2015] EWHC 3070 (QB). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
Moreover, if it were held that the English courts possess jurisdiction over the matter then the legality and legitimacy of the damages remedy in light of the principle of effectiveness of EU law (effet utile) and the principle of mutual trust would be implicated which may have necessitated a reassessment of Longmore LJ’s controversial decision in Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs AG (The Alexandros T) [2014] EWCA Civ 1010. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
Although the Court doubted that the courts today would have invented such a rule, they accepted that the doctrine is a long-standing principle of English law, is common to almost all major systems of law, and that judicial abolishment would be inconsistent with the way the English common law system works. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
a fully-fledged English translation). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
This is one of a series of posts about the pending EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and its consequences for intermediaries and user speech online. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:10 am
M'Bala v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
Furthermore, Google Spain had no bearing on how English law should approach a contention that a given defendant was liable for breach of Article 8. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
David Kopel replies to criticism of the treatment of English legal history and the right to carry arms in an amicus brief in Wrenn v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Nevertheless, the author argues that most late eighteenth-century English judges viewed copyright as having a pre-statutory basis in the common law. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Palomoares v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Alternatively, Alba was a corporate shell which he had created and they were joint tortfeasors (an English concept which nevertheless seems to have been understood and accepted).In response, Mr Emerson, argued simply that he had decided to incorporate Alba so that his business could benefit from limited liability. [read post]
