Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 5,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm
Flores told Altamirano that he felt more comfortable working with Citibank and Chase, where he had personal contacts. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 4:36 am
He stated, “The film is so big and so big an event that it’s just not possible for it to be in all locations on its opening day. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:48 am
Here is an excerpt from the actual court opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:12 am
For example, in Dymow v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am
Eck said it felt like a no-hitter. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
She no “longer felt I could cover the court without also giving cover to a system that erased women. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm
She explained that Wagner wasn’t hired because the faculty felt she didn’t understand the analysis portion of the legal research and writing program and that the hiring justification summary reflected that sentiment. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
On the other hand, on behalf of the respondent, State of West Bengal, in opposition to that plea, reliance was placed on a later decision of this Court in Akbar Sheikh and others v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm
On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
In a 1941 case called Associated Press v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:55 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Past week: US v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:25 am
” Crownover v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
In drug cases, though, Congress and the courts change all the rules: in most states you can’t even argue the drug maker was negligent, you can only argue the drug maker didn’t warn you that they were negligent. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:38 am
In it’s decision notice the GSCC stated that Mr Place’s criticism of delay in CAFCASS reporting on a private forum was “legitimate” and that “the facts supported the stance taken by [Mr Place] that CAFCASS had put a dishonest spin on the scale of the problems it faced. [read post]
