Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 4961 - 4980 of 16,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2018, 4:28 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
A través de una nueva ley, la Asamblea Legislativa concedió a las asociaciones de residentes o corporaciones sin fines de lucro que se constituyen en las urbanizaciones un mecanismo con acceso controlado los mecanismos y/o penalidades para poder incentivar el pago de las cuotas. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 7:21 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
”(p. 13)Por último esboza una definición: “la CJPI puede ser esquematizada como un conjunto de actividades procesales (cuya proyección no se agota en las simples formas), regulares (normales), concretas y de diverso nivel, cumplidas por órganos jurisdiccionales competentes en materia penal, pertenecientes a distintos Estados soberanos, que convergen funcional y necesariamente a nivel internacional, en la realización de un mismo fin, que no es otro que… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:04 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El PSAJ y la Oficina de la Procuradora de las Mujeres estarán a cargo de desarrollar o adquirir la aplicación que cumpla con estos fines. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
We’ll take it away (then you can make us pay) – Zoe McCallum “Fake” news versus “wrong” news: a nonideological approach to a smarter readership – Charles J Glasser Case Law, Strasbourg: Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania, Fine over “Jesus” and “Mary” advertising campaign, Article 10 violation – Hugh Tomlinson QC Internet legal developments to look out for in 2018 – Graham Smith   [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 1:38 pm by Julia Malleck
Department of Justice officially dismissed their appeal of case Whistleblower 21276-13W and 21277-13W v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
  He advances a test of the status quo – everything is fine with no over-blocking – with rampant unchecked piracy over the inadvertent, occasional, avoidable, and reversible potential cases of over-blocking. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In coming to his decision that the Claimant had been “taken for a ride”, the Judge stated emphatically that “not to put too fine a point on it, he [the Claimant] had been defrauded and blackmailed. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:18 pm by Richard Hunt
The ads were fine, it was the targeting of the ads that was discriminatory. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am by Jessica Perry
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]