Search for: "High v State"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
Brandishing a novel interpretation of the Second Amendment, the Court has either struck down or raised questions about virtually every state and local gun-control law in the nation. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:21 am
Delivering a splintered 6-3 ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
Maine law authorized only the state attorney general—not private parties—to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain antitrust violations, the state's high court explained.Because private parties were not bound by the government litigation, any liability to private parties could be determined separately under Maine's statutory framework. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
It held that under Volkswagenwerk AG v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:17 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Oracle America Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 997 (24 August 2010) Southern Insulation (Medway) Ltd v How Engineering Services Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 999 (20 August 2010) Chubb Fire Ltd v The Vicar of Spalding & Churchwardens and Church Council of the Church of St Mary & St Nicholas, Spalding [2010] EWCA Civ 981 (20 August 2010) Sebastian Holdings Inc v Deutsche Bank AG [2010] EWCA Civ 998 (20… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
”Now imagine that another case arises in a state high court. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Clarke LJ gave three key reasons in support of his conclusion: The structure of the Policy expressly stated that the insured perils were subject always to the exclusions. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
This month's Business Valuation Update includes a lengthy analysis of a recent stock valuation decision in a high-stakes corporate dissolution case, Kaplan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
" [citing: Sierra Club v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Thrailkill observed that the second man wore a red Lamar High School hoodie with the hood drawn tight around his face.Bryant v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
” Jenkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:24 pm
A v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
In JP Morgan Chase, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:58 am
According to the Los Angeles Times, Nick was a highly regarded high school athlete at San Clemente High School. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
In the following case, Apotex v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
