Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 4961 - 4980
of 62,920
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 10:58 am
The California Supreme Court says that it's okay to simply file written objections, and if the trial court doesn't rule on them, they're presumed overruled and you can argue error in the Court of Appeal if you'd like. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:25 am
California makes it illegal to wear body armor if you're a serious violent felon. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStockConsumer Reviews * In re Margrett A. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
" Blondin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:56 am
The Ninth Circuit's holding in Concepcion v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:13 am
At least when they're well-founded. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
If you're on it, your vote should count. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
Most of the time, we don't leave a police encounter, even if it's unwanted (as it often is), because we don't want to be rude or because we're not sure we're allowed. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
Yep, it's four times more likely that they're correlated. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:42 am
The Court of Appeal’s guidance given in JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 42 in respect of anonymity orders was held to apply equally to orders applied for under section 39. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
The European Court of Justice has finally ruled on the landmark case of L’Oréal v eBay (C-324/09) . [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 1:41 pm
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Blackcrow v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:43 pm
Mktg., L.L.C., 61 Cal. 4th 988 (2015); In re Estate of Duke, 61 Cal. 4th 871 (2015); In re Marriage of Davis, 61 Cal. 4th 846 (2015); People v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
The plaintiffs relied on a case, Romero v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
See also In re Asbestos Prods. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:09 pm
It's an important case for delineating the scope of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:11 pm
If you're talking to Paul Krugman, it would depend on when you asked him, as Ruth Marcus documents in this column. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
(Waller v. [read post]
