Search for: "In re DAVIS" Results 4961 - 4980 of 4,995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2006, 7:12 am
Unfortunately, thousands of Americans are victimized just like Davis, Dickerson and Martinez. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 7:40 am
Davis, a partner and Weil Gotshal's general counselThis is one of those sentences: if you're not reading it carefully, you'll just nod your head because it has a lot of common catchphrases ("healthy institution"... [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 1:17 pm
(We're guessing that most, if not all, are non-equity partners [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 10:51 am
Korrell of Seattle's Davis Wright Tremaine. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:27 am
Isabel Davies (CMS Cameron McKenna) was one of the trilogy of lucky people who acquired a golden duck (left) on Wednesday night at the Stephen Stewart Memorial Lecture (IPKat report here). [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 5:36 am
For example, In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688, 692, 16 USPQ2d 1897, 1900 (Fed. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Hilton Davis, and later re-enforced by the Supreme Court in Festo: Because "many millions" of patents were granted under the disputed [motivation] standard and patents can be challenged at any time, Goldstein says, "If the Supreme Court does decide to make a substantial change, it will call into question innumerable patents. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 4:20 am
If you're a person of delicate sensibilities, please exercise discretion in deciding whether to read further. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:48 am
And they're likely to mean very good associate bonuses for 2006. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:45 am by Frodnesor
In re Attorneys at Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 2006 WL 2925199 (S.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:45 am by Frodnesor
In re Attorneys at Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 2006 WL 2925199 (S.D. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 8:46 pm
The Wikipedia entry says that the term "intellectual dishonesty" is just "an obfuscatory way to say 'you're lying.'"  But the word "dishonesty" doesn't exactly beat around the bush. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 8:32 am
What they're both doing-- proposing big tax cuts-- hardly requires much political courage. [read post]