Search for: "In re David T."
Results 4961 - 4980
of 13,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2015, 8:44 am
Very truly yours, Jim Hood, Attorney General By: David K. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 11:08 am
We also don't know about editing of any of the koala selfies (eg by cropping, colouring, re-positioning): if there has been editorial input, this might again pass a copyright to a human. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am
I don’t really like trademark dilution, no. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:13 am
If you don’t have a copy of Garner’s or some other usage dictionary, you may want to get one after reading Quack This Way: David Foster Wallace & Bryan A. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:21 pm
This happened along Braeswood Boulevard at about 2:00 a.m. this morning and the drive who was arrested was identified as David Daniel Rodriguez, 23 years old. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
You’re not one…Remember this. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:11 am
Some may mention the issue of “asymmetrical litigation,” a David v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
To the extent the other team finds it necessary to vilify defense lawyers, as they accuse us of vilifying prosecutors, maybe we’re closer to level than we think. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 5:17 pm
For example, management teams frequently don’t see enough immediate financial impact to justify additional investments. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
The “targeting” or “purposeful availment” requirement that is so central to U.S. law before a court can find jurisdiction doesn’t apply: For the purposes of determining the place where the damage occurred with a view to attributing jurisdiction on the basis of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001, it is irrelevant that the website at issue in the main proceedings is not directed at the Member State in which the court seised is situated. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:05 am
“We’re upholding the principle that bigger nations can’t bully the small — by opposing Russian aggression, and supporting Ukraine’s democracy, and reassuring our NATO allies. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am
., and David Vitter, R-La., and Reps. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:44 am
They’re odd injunctions. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
” Professor David C. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
” If you’re still with me, the last relevant theoretical point is that Justice Antonin Scalia has long been leading, within the Court, a re-evaluation of Fourth Amendment doctrine in favor of privacy (and thus often in favor of criminal defendants). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm
You’re 1) not being productive, and 2) you’re not goal setting, you’re dreaming. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:58 pm
We’re too implicated and we don’t know what to do with it. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:01 pm
After all, they're like rock stars. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Flores (1993): 6-3 defeat (Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, Stephen Breyer and David Souter dissenting) for the Catholic claimants who sought an exemption from historic landmark preservation laws for a church building that they wanted to alter. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
” Those effects were felt in California because, the court explained, “[t]he allegedly libelous story concerned the California activities of a California resident. [read post]
