Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 40,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Moreover, because some of the Foreign Affairs Manual provisions largely parroted the applicable statutory standards, Exemption 7(E) could not justify redacting those portions of the Manual. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
In Bacchus Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
From State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:55 pm
An interesting recent case under the Equal Status Act 2000:Mongans v Clare County Council - DEC-S2008-039http://www.equalitytribunal.ie/index.asp? [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:39 am
Simcox v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
In, Panteleris v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:46 pm
A large number of companies produce SIP or IAX compatible VoIP desktop phones. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:00 am
Spillman v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion, Duran v. [read post]
Merrill Lynch v. Manning: SCOTUS to Decide Scope of Federal Jurisdiction in Certain Securities Cases
15 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
On December 1, 2015, the Supreme Court heard argument in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:08 pm
City of Valdez, Alaska Issue: Whether a municipal tax that falls exclusively on large vessels in the city's harbor violates the Tonnage Clause, Commerce Clause, or Due Process Clause. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:11 am
Supreme Court announced that it would hear Wal-Mart’s appeal of the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision upholding the certification of a class action gender discrimination lawsuit in Dukes v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:59 am
Compensation for court document translations, as mentioned in a previous legal translation blog post, and the Supreme Court's decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:36 pm
In California Correctional Peace Officers' Association v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
See Ewert v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
Plano is important because it is Corporate HQ for a number of large companies and also serves as regional HQ for many others. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
For in Miller v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
Whether dealing with a high value claim or large volumes of low value claims, this extra 2.5% is important. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 9:17 am
I’m fine with this outcome, but this interpretation of Section 230(c)(1) largely duplicates Section 230(c)(2), so it seems to pose a statutory construction conundrum. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 5:51 am
Last year, in Berisha v. [read post]
